Enterprise
In a groundbreaking enforcement that sets the tone for privacy oversight nationwide, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has issued its first major settlement, fining American Honda Motor Co., Inc. $632,500 for violations of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). This is more than a compliance citation—it’s a regulatory shot across the bow to any enterprise underestimating the role of privacy user experience (UX). The CPPA made clear: the way privacy is operationalized matters just as much as what’s written in your policy.
The official settlement announcement by the CPPA outlines four key violations. Honda allegedly demanded excessive personal information to process privacy rights requests, failed to provide equal access to opt-out and opt-in mechanisms, enforced burdensome verification processes for authorized agents, and neglected to implement adequate contracts with advertising technology partners. These weren’t technical failings—they were strategic missteps in the execution of consumer privacy.
What makes this enforcement so notable is its focus on usability. Honda’s penalties weren’t tied to data breaches or security flaws. Instead, the CPPA honed in on friction points that prevented consumers from exercising their rights. In doing so, the agency validated what privacy leaders and analysts have been warning for years: privacy UX is now a front-line compliance issue.
For context, leading coverage of the action from Bloomberg Law, Reuters, and IAPP reinforces this message. As enforcement accelerates, companies must transition from static documentation to dynamic implementation. Privacy is now about design, interaction, and continuous accountability.
The CPPA’s findings align directly with Gartner’s emerging privacy UX guidance, which emphasizes that effective privacy management should be designed with the user in mind. According to Gartner’s framework on privacy UX, three foundational pillars define whether an organization is truly consumer-centric in its approach: Human-Centered Transparency, Minimized Friction, and Meaningful Control.
Honda’s execution appeared to fall short across all three dimensions.
Human-Centered Transparency means users should be able to easily understand what data is being collected, how it’s being used, and how to exercise their rights. In this case, Honda allegedly required consumers to submit an excessive amount of personal information just to initiate a data rights request. This added layer of effort created unnecessary confusion, and it flies in the face of California’s mandate for clear and accessible privacy processes.
Minimized Friction requires that the user journey for privacy choices be simple and intuitive. The CPPA specifically cited that Honda made it harder for consumers to opt out of the sale or sharing of their data than it was to opt in. This imbalance not only frustrates consumers—it potentially violates the spirit and letter of the CCPA by discouraging opt-out behavior through design.
Meaningful Control is about genuine agency. Users should have the power to delegate rights and take action without obstruction. However, Honda allegedly forced consumers to confirm—directly and manually—that they had authorized an agent to submit an opt-out request on their behalf. This undermined the principle of user empowerment and created a compliance bottleneck.
One of the clearest takeaways from the CPPA’s enforcement is this: it’s no longer enough to have a well-crafted privacy policy tucked away on your website. If the experience doesn’t match the words—if it’s confusing, inconsistent, or difficult to execute—your organization could be at risk. Regulators are watching how privacy is practiced in real time, not just how it’s written.
This is especially relevant for companies juggling privacy regulations across multiple jurisdictions. With more than a dozen U.S. states implementing their own privacy laws in 2024 and 2025, and with international standards from the GDPR to Brazil’s LGPD, implementation must be more than legal checkboxes. It must be operationalized into every customer-facing system.
The Honda settlement should serve as a wake-up call for privacy officers, compliance teams, and executive leadership. The regulatory focus has moved beyond breach response and policy language—it’s now about the entire ecosystem of privacy interactions, including how your systems work in practice, how your partners behave, and how your users experience their rights.
That’s a tall order for traditional compliance tools, which often rely on static assessments, internal questionnaires, or slow manual reviews. Privacy isn’t just about internal controls anymore—it’s about your extended business ecosystem, and it’s about keeping pace with how regulators, partners, and even competitors are evolving.
Privaini was built for this moment. As regulators shift their lens toward user experience and ecosystem accountability, Privaini provides companies with a clear, outside-in view of their privacy posture—leveraging data from over 100 external sources to identify risks before they become headlines.
Our platform automates privacy posture assessments, monitors tracking technologies, and reveals how your actual privacy UX stacks up against regulatory expectations across markets. Whether you're assessing vendor compliance, monitoring real-time cookie behavior, or preparing for an audit, Privaini helps translate your policy into practice.
With no questionnaires and no intrusive agents, we streamline what was once a cumbersome process into an agile, automated program that can scale globally.
Our approach aligns directly with Gartner’s recommendations, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring, automation, and frictionless compliance enablement. And unlike traditional tools, we don’t just show you what’s on paper—we show you what’s happening on the ground.
The Honda case was the CPPA’s first enforcement action, but it won’t be the last. If your business relies on outdated privacy processes or manual oversight, the risk is growing every day—not just of fines, but of reputational harm and loss of consumer trust.
At Privaini, we’re ready to help you shift from reactive compliance to proactive readiness. Reach out today for a no-cost privacy posture evaluation and get a real-time, actionable view of how your privacy program is being experienced—by users, by partners, and by regulators.
About the Author
Sanjay Saini is CEO and Founder of Privaini. He has spent the past two decades building data governance and compliance solutions that help organizations stay trusted, secure, and ahead of risk. Follow him on LinkedIn.
‍
